Friday, June 29, 2007

Changes in the Way the World Works

Hi, Everybody!

I've been thinking again. Watch out.

We are actually witnessing the beginning of a change in the way the world works. I haven't seen anyone else make this connection, but then it may be obvious to everybody but me.

Historically, there have been two major types of human organization on Earth. The first type is described by the concept of the nation. It has the following characteristics:

1. It is geographically fixed, with borders that normally do not move. You can find these borders on a map.

2. It is a group of people with a common goal to protect the nation in which they live, as an extension of self-defense. This is called nationalism, and in an individual is called patriotism.

3. Historically almost all wars were fought between these nations, up until about 20 years ago. These wars have generally been about either resources (including territory) or about ideology of government.

The second type of organization transcends national borders. They may have members in many countries. They have the following characteristics:

1. The organization has no fixed borders.

2. Members of these groups have an allegiance to the organization which sometimes exceeds the individual's allegiance to the country in which they live.

3. Most such organizations share some sort of belief system, or at least philosophy.

There are three major subspecies of this transnational type of organization. They are:

1. Terrorist organizations, such as Al Quaida

2. Regular religious organizations, such as the Catholic Church

3. Major international corporations, such as Exxon or Microsoft

Historically, transnational organizations have influenced national governments by political or financial leverage (such as is wielded by the Catholic Church or Microsoft).

However, we are now witnessing the manifestation of militant activist or terrorist transnational organizations which do and will continue to play a major part in the political life of the planet. These groups exert influence through force of arms, propaganda and outright control of certain conventional governments. They are extra-legal in the sense that, as an organization, they are not bound by the laws of any country; although their individual members are nominally bound by local law.

This 'paradigm shift' is radically changing the way politics works, as well as the way war is waged. As we have seen, conventional warfare works well against nations, but not so well when the enemy doesn't have borders. Different strategies will have to evolve. A nation fighting these borderless organizations is like a man swatting bees. You can swat a few, but it is very difficult to get them all. Note that these transnationals even have representation in our government (through their members who are in our government, or who vote), as well as directly controlling certain other governments, so even our internal political scene is affected. This is why unlimited (legal or illegal) immigration is such a bad idea.

It's similar to the mental shift that was a result of the American Revolution. Up until then, armies lined up in neat rows to shoot at each other. The colonists, on the other hand, shot from behind trees and rocks. The British thought this was not 'cricket', but they had to change the way they did things to accommodate this new tactic. Fortunately for us they didn't change their tactics until after the American Revolution was settled.

I don't know how this is going to play out, but the variety of different viewpoints present in our population, bolstered by legal and illegal immigration, and liberalism vs conservatism, is playing a part in it. It wasn't like this when I was a kid, but by the time I was in high school the near-universal disgust with the Vietnam War was causing the concept of patriotism to fall out of favor at that time. It became acceptable for a US citizen to criticize the US publicly. Up until that time, it was just 'understood' that the US was the best anywhere (still true) and almost nobody questioned it. The loss of consistency in a belief in the basic wholesomeness of our country leaves the door wide open for the growth of transnational terrorist organizations within our borders.

We're all in for a wild ride - you young people more than me. Good luck.

-Pop

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

That's a very interesting observation. Particularly the "man swatting bees" analogy. Very acurate in my view.

As long as political correctness gets votes, and votes get power, then the backbones of the men and women able to hold off terrorism from our country will only get weaker and weaker. I am not an advocate of "Nuke and Pave" because not everybody over there is a terrorist. However, I do agree that we really need some new tactics to deal with the situation at hand. People are avoiding the obvious because of the fear of offending people.

Keep 'em coming Pop!